Independent financial research   /   Evidence before inferenceAbout Jeong-Mo Goo

Calculation notebook

Financial analysis

NAV: an estimate with assumptions, not a price promise

Construct a simple net asset value bridge and test how debt and capitalization rates change the result.

The estimate behind the acronym

Net asset value estimates the current value of assets after subtracting liabilities and senior claims. For an equity REIT, an analyst often values stabilized properties using income and capitalization rates, then separately considers development, land, cash, and other businesses. Dividing common equity value by an appropriate diluted share count produces NAV per share. This is an estimate, not an executable sale offer. Accounting book value follows a different purpose and should not be silently substituted for estimated market value.

Work through the numbers

Hypothetical arithmetic: leverage amplifies uncertainty

Hypothetical example · USD per share · same NOI and claims
6% cap rate
31.00 NAV
7% cap rate
≈ 23.86 NAV

Assume stabilized NOI of $60 million, a 6% cap rate, $20 million cash, $400 million debt, and 20 million shares, with no other claims. Property value is $1 billion and NAV is ($1,000m + $20m − $400m) / 20m = $31 per share. At a 7% cap rate, property value falls to about $857.1 million and NAV to about $23.86. A one-percentage-point cap-rate change reduces this simplified equity estimate by roughly 23%.

Build a transparent asset bridge

Group properties by economically meaningful factors such as geography, sector, lease duration, and condition. Apply an explicitly stated income period and cap-rate range to each group. Add nonoperating assets separately and avoid valuing a development both as completed income and as construction in progress. Subtract debt, preferred equity, relevant liabilities, and minority interests consistently. Joint ventures require particular care: proportionate income should be matched with proportionate assets and debt. A beautifully precise spreadsheet cannot correct a mismatched ownership basis.

Why a discount may persist

An asset-focused investor may see a share price below estimated NAV as an attractive entry. A skeptical investor may see outdated property assumptions, large refurbishment needs, taxes, transaction costs, or weak capital allocation. A premium can reflect expected growth or operating capabilities, but can also reflect optimistic pricing. A discount alone does not identify which interpretation is correct. Ask what observable event could close it, what costs that event would involve, and whether selling assets would leave the remaining portfolio weaker.

Read evidence and show a range

Start with property income, debt notes, ownership disclosures, and development commitments in issuer filings. Compare assumptions with disclosed transactions that genuinely resemble the properties under review; headline averages from another sector are weak evidence. State the valuation date and distinguish trailing from forward income. Present a sensitivity grid rather than one authoritative-looking number. If recent comparable transactions are sparse, widen the range and say why. NAV sensitivity is a way to expose assumptions, not a forecast that the stock will converge to your estimate.

A common mistake

A share-price discount to estimated NAV is not a guaranteed return or a guaranteed liquidation value.

What to check in the disclosures

  • State the date and income period.
  • Use an ownership-consistent debt bridge.
  • Include senior claims and development commitments.
  • Show multiple cap-rate assumptions.

Sources & scope

This guide focuses on US REITs. Examples are hypothetical unless explicitly attributed. Definitions and issuer disclosures can change; use the current source and the issuer's own reconciliation.

Educational material, not a recommendation or personalized investment advice. How these guides are prepared · Report a correction

Continue learning

Connect the next piece.

All guides →